Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Richard Carl Peppers, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Richard Carl Peppers, Appellant, filed an untimely pro se notice of appeal from a conviction for driving while intoxicated. We dismiss the appeal.
The documents on file in this case indicate that Appellant's sentence was imposed on February 13, 2014, and that his pro se notice of appeal was filed in the district clerk's office on November 21, 2014. When the appeal was filed in this court, we notified Appellant by letter that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that the appeal may be dismissed. We also noted that the trial court's certification of Appellant's right of appeal indicated that Appellant has no right of appeal because this is a plea-bargain case. See Tex.R.App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The certification also indicates that Appellant waived his right of appeal. We requested that Appellant respond to our letter and show grounds to continue. Appellant has responded but has not shown grounds to continue the appeal.
Pursuant to Tex.R.App. P. 26.2, a notice of appeal is due to be filed either (1) within thirty days after the date that sentence is imposed in open court or (2) if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial, within ninety days after the date that sentence is imposed in open court. A notice of appeal must be in writing and filed with the clerk of the trial court. Tex.R.App. P. 25.2(c)(1). The documents on file in this court reflect that Appellant's notice of appeal was filed with the clerk of the trial court 281 days after his sentence was imposed. The notice of appeal was, therefore, untimely. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of a timely motion for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex.Crim.App.1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519 (Tex.Crim.App.1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex.Crim.App.1993). Because we have no jurisdiction, we must dismiss the appeal.
This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 11–14–00332–CR
Decided: December 19, 2014
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)