DIAZ CASTRO v. STATE (2022)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Our review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. The October 20, 2021, order purportedly denying Diaz-Castro's petitions did not resolve all of the claims raised below. Specifically, the order did not address claims raised in Diaz-Castro's pro se postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The order was thus not a final order. See Sandstrom v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 121 Nev. 657, 659, 119 P.3d 1250, 1252 (2005) (“[A] final order [is] one that disposes of all issues and leaves nothing for future consideration.”). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, see NRS 177.015(3); NRS 34.575(1), and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.