WEISS v. STATE (2022)

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Weiss claimed he is entitled to the application of statutory credits to his minimum sentence pursuant to NRS 209.4465(7)(b). The district court found Weiss's sentence was the result of a conviction for voluntary manslaughter committed after the effective date of NRS 209.4465(8). These findings are supported by the record. Because Weiss was convicted of a crime of violence and a category B felony, see NRS 200.080, committed after the effective date of NRS 209.4465(8)(a) and (d), see 2007 Nev. Stat., ch. 525, § 22, at 3196, he was precluded from the application of credits to his minimum sentence. We therefore conclude the district court did not err by denying this claim.¹

Weiss also claimed the application of NRS 209.4465(8) violates the Equal Protection Clause. This court has addressed a similar claim and found it to lack merit. See Vickers v. Dzurenda, 134 Nev. 747, 748-51, 433 P.3d 306, 308-10 (Ct. App. 2018). We therefore conclude the district court did not err by denying this claim.

Finally, Weiss claimed the application of NRS 209.4465(8) violates the Ex Post Facto Clause. A requirement for an Ex Post Facto Clause violation is that the statute applies to events occurring before it was enacted. Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29 (1981). Because NRS 209.4465(8) was enacted before Weiss committed his crime, its application does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause. We therefore conclude the district court did not err by denying this claim. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

FOOTNOTES

1.   To the extent Weiss argued his claims should be evaluated under NRS 209.443, he failed to demonstrate this statute applied to him because he committed his crime after July 1, 1985.