LERTSWAN v. STATE (2021)

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Lertswan asserts the district court abused its discretion by imposing a sentence amounting to cruel and unusual punishment. Lertswan waived his right to appeal from his judgment of conviction. He does not challenge the validity of that waiver or claim the sentence was not imposed in accordance with the negotiated agreement. We therefore conclude Lertswan is not entitled to relief, see Cruzado v. State, 110 Nev. 745, 747, 879 P.2d 1195, 1195-96 (1994), overruled on other grounds by Lee v. State, 115 Nev. 207, 210, 985 P.2d 164, 166 (1999), and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.