PECK v. WILLIAMS (2020)

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Peck claimed his rights to due process, free speech, and access to the courts were violated during a prison disciplinary hearing that resulted in a reprimand. We conclude the district court did not err by denying Peck's petition, because Peck did not lose statutory credits and his challenges to the conditions of confinement were not cognizable in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See NRS 34.720; Bowen v. Warden, 100 Nev. 489, 490, 686 P.2d 250, 250 (1984). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.