TAYLOR v. STATE (2020)

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Robert Lee Taylor appeals from an order of the district court denying a motion for modification of sentence filed on October 15, 2019. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Valerie Adair, Judge.

In his motion, Taylor claimed the district court relied on mistaken assumptions about his criminal record because the offense synopsis in the presentence investigation report (PSI) included facts from crimes committed on April 8, 10, and 11, 2017. Taylor claimed that he was not convicted of those crimes; therefore, it was error for them to be included. The supreceding indictment that Taylor pleaded guilty to was plead in the alternative to encompass all of the crimes committed between April 7 and April 11, 2017. Thus, the offense synopsis in the PSI properly included facts from the crimes committed on April 8, 10, and 11. Further, Taylor received the sentence he bargained for in the plea agreement. Therefore, Taylor failed to demonstrate the district court relied on mistaken assumptions regarding his criminal record that worked to his extreme detriment, see Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996), and we conclude the district court did not err by denying Taylor's motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.