Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Dexter OWENS, Appellant, v. Isidro BACA, Warden, Respondent.
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
Dexter Owens appeals from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed on May 8, 2019. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge.
In his petition, Owens argued he is entitled to court ordered parole on his current sentence because he has served the total minimum amount of time required by his judgment of conviction. The district court found that Owens was convicted of second-degree murder with the use of a deadly weapon in 2001 for a crime committed in 1999. The district court further found that Owens was sentenced to a term of life in prison with the possibility of parole after a minimum term of 10 years has been served for the primary offense and an equal and consecutive term for the deadly weapon enhancement. See 1995 Nev. Stat., ch. 455, § 1, at 1431 (former NRS 193.165(1)); NRS 200.030(5)(a). Finally, the district court found that Owens was paroled from his underlying sentence to his consecutive sentence in 2016 and Owens now has a projected parole eligibility date of March 9, 2026.
The district court concluded nothing guarantees that an inmate will be granted parole upon completion of the minimum term of imprisonment and Owens does not have a fundamental right to parole. See NRS 213.10705 (providing that release on parole is an act of grace); NRS 213.120(2) (providing an inmate may be paroled after serving the minimum term of imprisonment); Anselmo v. Bisbee, 133 Nev. 317, 319-20, 396 P.3d 848, 850 (2017) (“[A]n inmate does not have any protectable due process or liberty interest in release on parole, unless that right is created by state statute.”). The district court further concluded Owens' parole eligibility date has been properly calculated and, therefore, the district court denied Owens' petition. The record supports the district court's findings, and we conclude the district court did not err by denying Owens' petition. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 79193-COA
Decided: April 28, 2020
Court: Court of Appeals of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)