NORMAN v. LOCOCO RE MAX AFTS (2026)

Court of Appeals of Nevada.

Richard Alan NORMAN, Appellant, v. Frank Stephen LOCOCO; Northstar Lending Group; Ticor Title of Nevada, Inc.; Rishele Thompson; Jim Valentine; Gregory V. Holst; Jake Fair; RE/MAX Realty Affiliates; John Fisher; James McKinney; Ruthella McKinney; Allied Foreclosure Systems, d/b/a AFTS; and Eric Johnson, Respondents.

No. 90558-COA

Decided: June 12, 2026

Richard Alan Norman Fidelity National Law Group/Las Vegas Woodburn & Wedge Clouser Law Group, Ltd. Garin Law Group Oshinski & Forsberg, Ltd. The Law Office of Otto & Jenkins

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Our review of the documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). The challenged order is a post-judgment order denying a motion to dismiss, which does not qualify as a special order after final judgment because it does not alter the rights of any party incorporated in the final judgment. See Gumm v. Mainor, 118 Nev. 912, 920, 59 P.3d 1220, 1225 (2002) (defining an appealable special order after final judgment as a post-judgment order that affects the rights of a party to the action, growing out of the previously entered judgment).

Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network