Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
KELLY LANE ALBIANI, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
Kelly Lane Albiani appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered pursuant to a no contest plea, of attempted reckless driving resulting in substantial bodily harm or death. Fourth Judicial District Court, Elko County; Alvin R. Kacin, Judge.
Albiani claims the district court abused its discretion by sentencing him to a term of 19 to 48 months in prison rather than placing him on probation. In support of his claim, Albiani relies on the dissent in Sims v. State, 107 Nev. 438, 441, 814 P.2d 63, 65 (1991) (Rose, J., dissenting), as well as the concurrence in Santana v. State, 122 Nev. 1458, 1464, 148 P.3d 741, 745 (2006) (Rose, C.J., concurring), which both argue for an expanded appellate review of sentencing decisions.
In this matter, the granting of probation was discretionary. See NRS 176A.100(1)(c); Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987) (“The sentencing judge has wide discretion in imposing a sentence ․”). Generally, this court will not interfere with a sentence imposed by the district court that falls within the parameters of relevant sentencing statutes “[s]o long as the record does not demonstrate prejudice resulting from consideration of information or accusations founded on facts supported only by impalpable or highly suspect evidence.” Silks v. State, 92 Nev. 91, 94, 545 P.2d 1159, 1161 (1976); see Cameron v. State, 114 Nev. 1281, 1283, 968 P.2d 1169, 1171 (1998).
Albiani's sentence of 19 to 48 months in prison is within the parameters provided by the relevant statutes, see NRS 193.153(1)(a)(3); NRS 484B.653(1)(b), and Albiani does not allege the district court relied on impalpable or highly suspect evidence. Moreover, the record reflects that the district court heard arguments from Albiani's counsel, Albiani spoke on his own behalf in mitigation, and the court considered Albiani's arguments and prior performance on probation before imposing his sentence. We therefore conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to suspend the sentence and place Albiani on probation.1 Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
Bulla, C.J.
Gibbons, J.
Westbrook, J.
1To the extent Albiani argues on appeal that we should depart from Sims or Santana, and conduct a broader review of the district court's sentencing decision, this court cannot overrule Nevada Supreme Court precedent. See Eivazi v. Eivazi, 139 Nev. 408, 418 n.7, 537 P.3d 476, 487 n.7 (Ct. App. 2023).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 90154-COA
Decided: August 28, 2025
Court: Court of Appeals of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)