Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
RICHARD JASON DEUTCH, Petitioner, v. THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF NYE; THE HONORABLE KIMBERLY A. WANKER, DISTRICT JUDGE; JUSTICE COURT OF PAHRUMP TOWNSHIP; AND THE HONORABLE MICHELE FIORE, JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, Respondents, THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF
Richard Jason Deutch petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, prohibition, or certiorari, challenging the district court's order setting aside the Pahrump Justice Court's entry of a second amended judgment of conviction and reversing its grant of a motion for a new trial.
A writ of mandamus is available to compel the performance of an act that the law requires as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station or to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion. NRS 34.160; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Ct., 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). A writ of prohibition may issue to arrest the proceedings of a district court exercising its judicial functions, when such proceedings are in excess of the jurisdiction of the district court. NRS 34.320; Smith v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). And a petition for a writ of certiorari is limited to instances where the lower court has exceeded its jurisdiction and there is no appeal. NRS 34.020(2); Warren v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 134 Nev. 649, 650, 427 P.3d 1033, 1035 (2018). Petitions for extraordinary writs are addressed to the sound discretion of this court. See Zamarripa v. First Jud. Dist. Ct., 103 Nev. 638, 640, 747 P.2d 1386, 1387 (1987); State ex rel. Dep't of Transp. v. Thompson, 99 Nev. 358, 360, 662 P.2d 1338, 1339 (1983). Petitioner bears the burden to show that extraordinary relief is warranted, and such relief is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. Pan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004).
Based on our review of the petition, the response thereto, and the other documents before us, we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. Id. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Accordingly, we deny the petition. NRAP 21(b)(1).
It is so ORDERED.
Bulla, C.J.
Gibbons, J.
Westbrook, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 89523-COA
Decided: August 21, 2025
Court: Court of Appeals of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)