TRISTAN ALEXANDER DAVIS v. CHILD SUPPORT HEARING MASTER JAMES DAVIS CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION AND JAVEIA RILEY (2025)

ORDER DENYING EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging various orders in a child custody and support matter. A writ of mandamus is available to compel the performance of an act that the law requires as a duty resulting from an office, NRS 34.160, or to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion, Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Ct., 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). A writ of prohibition arrests the proceedings of a tribunal that is acting in excess of, or without, jurisdiction. NRS 34.320. The decision to entertain a petition for extraordinary writ relief is within our sole discretion, and the petitioner has the burden of demonstrating that such relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Having considered the petition and the supporting documents, we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that extraordinary relief is warranted and we therefore

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Bulla, C.J.

Gibbons, J.

Westbrook, J.