Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
EDILFREDO CHAVEZ, Appellant, v. RENEE BAKER, WARDEN; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents.
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
Edilfredo Chavez appeals from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed on October 7, 2019. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Carli Lynn Kierny, Judge.
Chavez filed his petition more than eight years after issuance of the remittitur on direct appeal on June 6, 2011.1 Thus, Chavez's petition was untimely filed. See NRS 34.726(1). Moreover, Chavez's petition was successive because he had previously filed two postconviction petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, one of which was decided on the merits.2 See NRS 34.810(1)(b)(2); NRS 34.810(3).3 Chavez's petition was procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(1)(b); NRS 34.810(4).
In his petition, Chavez argued he had good cause because an amended judgment of conviction had been filed on June 21, 2019, and his petition was timely filed from that amended judgment of conviction. The district court found that Chavez failed to demonstrate good cause because the claims raised in his petition did not relate to the amendments made to the judgment of conviction. See Sullivan v. State, 120 Nev. 537, 541, 96 P.3d 761, 764 (2004) (holding that an amended judgment of conviction may be good cause to overcome the procedural bars but the claims are limited to those “challeng[ing] the proceedings leading to [the] substantive amendment to the judgment and [that] could not have been raised in prior proceedings”). Chavez does not challenge this finding on appeal, and the record supports the district court's finding. Therefore, we conclude the district court did not err by denying the petition as procedurally barred, and we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
Bulla, C.J.
Gibbons, J.
Westbrook, J.
FOOTNOTES
1. Chavez v. State, No. 53365, 2011 WL 1833367 (Nev. May 12, 2011) (Order of Affirmance).
2. Chavez v. State, No. 63600, 2014 WL 2921899 (Nev. June 24, 2014) (Order of Affirmance); Chavez v. State, No. 69392-COA, 2016 WL 4424942 (Nev. Ct. App. Aug. 17, 2016) (Order of Affirmance).
3. The subsections within NRS 34.810 were recently renumbered. We note the substance of the subsections cited herein was not altered. See A.B. 49, 82nd Leg. (Nev. 2023).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 89196-COA
Decided: March 24, 2025
Court: Court of Appeals of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)