JARROD JAMES REBOTON v. THE STATE OF NEVADA (2024)

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Jarrod James Reboton appeals from a corrected district court order revoking probation. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; David A. Hardy, Judge.

Reboton contends the district court erred by denying him credit for time he spent in custody in Utah on a Nevada warrant hold awaiting his probation revocation hearing. Reboton relies on Nieto v. State, to argue he was entitled to the credit because he was in custody solely because of the Nevada warrant hold. 119 Nev. 229, 232, 70 P.3d 747, 748 (2003) (“[A] defendant is entitled to credit for time served in presentence confinement in another jurisdiction when that confinement was solely pursuant to the charges for which he was ultimately convicted.”). However, the record before this court does not demonstrate that Reboton was in custody in Utah solely because of the Nevada warrant hold, particularly where Reboton represented to the district court that he was eventually sentenced to “time served” in a Utah criminal case before being extradited to Nevada. Accordingly, we conclude the district court did not err by denying Reboton additional presentence credit for the time he spent in Utah, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Gibbons, C.J.

Bulla, J.

Westbrook, J.