Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ELOY GARCIA DIAZ, JR., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
Eloy Garcia Diaz, Jr., appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, of unlawful killing or maiming of a cat or dog or other pet. Fourth Judicial District Court, Elko County; Alvin R. Kacin, Judge.
Diaz argues the district court abused its discretion by denying his request for a mistrial after a State's witness referred to Diaz's criminal history. The State asked N. Noriega where her and Diaz's children had stayed since they were born, and she testified that the children had stayed with her because Diaz “was in and out of their lives while he was in prison.” “The trial court has discretion to determine whether a mistrial is warranted, and its judgment will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion.” Rudin v. State, 120 Nev. 121, 142, 86 P.3d 572, 586 (2004). Generally, a reference to criminal history violates a defendant's right to due process because it affects the presumption of innocence. Rice v. State, 108 Nev. 43, 44, 824 P.2d 281, 282 (1992). However, “inadvertent references to other criminal activity not solicited by the prosecution, which are blurted out by a witness, can be cured by the trial court's immediate admonishment to the jury to disregard the statement.” Sterling v. State, 108 Nev. 391, 394, 834 P.2d 400, 402 (1992).
Ms. Noriega's testimony about Diaz's criminal history was in response to the State's asking her where her children had lived. Thus, -her testimony was inadvertent and unsolicited. Further, Diaz objected to the testimony, the district court immediately sustained the objection, and it instructed the jury to disregard the testimony and to not consider the testimony in its deliberations. Thus, the district court sufficiently admonished the jury to disregard the statement. Therefore, we conclude that any error resulting from this testimony was cured and the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Diaz's request for a mistrial. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
Gibbons, C.J.
Bulla, J.
Westbrook, J.
cc: Hon. Alvin R. Kacin, District Judge
Elko County Public Defender
Attorney General/Carson City
Elko County District Attorney
Elko County Clerk
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 86840-COA
Decided: March 18, 2024
Court: Court of Appeals of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)