Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SCOTT O'NEAL ELLIOTT, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
Scott O'Neal Elliott appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered pursuant to a guilty plea, of gross misdemeanor child abuse and neglect. Fifth Judicial District Court, Nye County: Kimberly A. Wanker, Judge.
Elliott argues the district court abused its discretion at sentencing when it imposed the maximum possible sentence of 364 days in jail. The district court has wide discretion in its sentencing decision. See Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987). Generally, this court will not interfere with a sentence imposed by the district court that falls within the parameters of relevant sentencing statutes “[s]o long as the record does not demonstrate prejudice resulting from consideration of information or accusations founded on facts supported only by impalpable or highly suspect evidence.” Silks v. State, 92 Nev. 91, 94, 545 P.2d 1159, 1161 (1976); see Cameron v. State, 114 Nev. 1281. 1283, 968 P.2d 1169, 1171 (1998).
Elliott argues the district court relied on impalpable and. highly suspect information, namely his repeated failure to appear for court and his evaluation pursuant to NRS 176A.110(1)(b). which indicates that he poses a moderate risk to reoffend. Elliott does not explain why his repeated failure to appear for sentencing or his evaluation constitute impalpable or highly suspect evidence. The record indicates that Elliott failed to appear for his sentencing hearing four times and that the district court ultimately issued a no-bail bench warrant. And the district court acknowledged at sentencing that Elliott was determined to pose a moderate risk to reoffend. Further, the sentence imposed is within the parameters provided by the relevant statutes. See NRS 193.140; NRS 200.508(2)(b)(1). Having considered the sentence and the crime, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Elliott. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
Gibbons, C.J.
Bulla, J.
Westbrook, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 86793-COA
Decided: January 25, 2024
Court: Court of Appeals of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)