Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MARVIN MORAN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
Marvin Moran appeals from an order of the district court denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed on October 6, 2021. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Carli Lynn Kierny, Judge.
Moran filed his petition more than three years after entry of the remittitur on direct appeal on July 23, 2018. See Moran v. State, No. 67881, 2018 WL 3216887 (Nev. June 25, 2018) (Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part, and Remanding). Thus, Moran's petition was untimely filed. See NRS 34.726(1). Moreover, Moran's petition constituted an abuse of the writ to the extent he raised claims new and different from those raised in his previous petition.1 See NRS 34.810(l)(b)(2); NRS 34.810(3).2 Moran's petition was procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(l)(b); NRS 34.810(4).
Moran suggested that he had good cause to overcome the procedural bars because he needed to exhaust his claims in state court before a federal court would consider them. Filing a procedurally barred petition for exhaustion purposes does not constitute good cause because Moran's claims were reasonably available to be raised in a timely petition. See Colley v. State, 105 Nev. 235, 236, 773 P.2d 1229, 1230 (1989), abrogated by statute on other grounds as recognized, by State v. Huebler, 128 Nev. 192, 197 n.2, 275 P.3d 91, 95 n.2 (2012). Therefore, Moran failed to demonstrate that exhaustion constituted good cause, and we conclude the district court did not err by denying the petition as procedurally barred. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
Gibbons, C.J.
Bulla, J.
Westbrook, J.
FOOTNOTES
1. See Moran v. State, No. 80328-COA, 2020 WL 6336062 (Nev. Ct. App. Oct. 28, 2020) (Order of Affirmance).
2. The subsections within NRS 34.810 were recently renumbered. We note the substance of the subsections cited herein was not altered. See A.B. 49, 82d Leg. (Nev. 2023).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 86087-COA
Decided: January 18, 2024
Court: Court of Appeals of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)