Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JEFFREY DAVID VOLOSIN, Appellant, v. PERRY RUSSELL, WARDEN; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents.
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
Jeffrey David Volosin appeals from an order of the district court denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed on April 22, 2021, and a supplemental petition filed on September 13, 2021.1 Third Judicial District Court, Lyon County; Leon Aberasturi, Judge.
Volosin argues the district court erred by denying his petition. The district court denied Volosin's petition because (1) the petition was procedurally barred and Volosin failed to demonstrate good cause to excuse the procedural bars; and (2) alternatively, Volosin's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel lacked merit. “[W]hen a district court provides independent alternative grounds in support of a decision later challenged on appeal, the appellant generally must successfully challenge all of those grounds in its appellate briefing to obtain a reversal.” Hung v. Berhad, 138 Nev., Adv. Op. 50, 513 P.3d 1285, 1287 (Ct. App. 2022). Moreover, if an appellant “fail[s] to challenge the alternative grounds in their opening brief, even if they later do so in the reply brief, the failure to raise those issues in the opening brief results in waiver.” Id.
Volosin s opening brief on appeal does not challenge the district court's determination that his petition is procedurally barred. Thus, Volosin has waived any such challenge. And because Volosin has waived any challenge to one of the independent alternative grounds for the district court's decision, we need not review the remaining alternative grounds—here, the merits of Volosin's claims. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
Gibbons, C.J.
Bulla, J.
Westbrook, J.
FOOTNOTES
1. We note that the notice of appeal indicates Volosin also appeals from the district court's order denying his “motion for amendment of findings” filed on April 6, 2022; however, Volosin presents no argument on appeal regarding the district court's order denying this motion. Therefore, we do not address it any further.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 85321-COA
Decided: November 22, 2023
Court: Court of Appeals of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)