Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Homaidan AL TURKI, Petitioner, v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Respondent.
¶1 Chief Justice Coats, Justice Boatright, and Justice Hart are of the opinion that the judgment of the court of appeals should be affirmed; whereas Justice Márquez, Justice Hood, and Justice Gabriel are of the opinion that it should be reversed. Justice Samour does not participate.
¶2 Because the court is equally divided, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 35(b).
PER CURIAM
JUSTICE SAMOUR does not participate.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Supreme Court Case No. 17SC339
Decided: September 23, 2019
Court: Supreme Court of Colorado.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)