Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN OF CALIFORNIA, Incorporated, Petitioner, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent, Kathy BROWN, Real Party in Interest.
Pursuant to rule 29.2, California Rules of Court, the following issue addressed by the Court of Appeal is specified as the sole issue for decision and argument:
“Whether a business establishment has a duty to comply with a robber's demands in order to avoid unreasonably increasing the risk of harm to a customer.”
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. S051085.
Decided: July 11, 1996
Court: Supreme Court of California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)