Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Appellants, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION, Appellant. CITRUS HEIGHTS INCORPORATED PROJECT, Real Party in Interest.
Petitions for review GRANTED.
The issue to be argued before this court shall be limited to whether Government Code section 57103 is unconstitutional as applied in this case.
LUCAS, C.J., and MOSK, PANELLI, KENNARD, ARABIAN, BAXTER and GEORGE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. S023805.
Decided: December 19, 1991
Court: Supreme Court of California,In Bank.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)