PEOPLE v. ROSBURY (1996)

Supreme Court of California.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. Edward ROSBURY et al., Appellants.

No. S053191.

Decided: June 12, 1996

Appellant Terrall McMillan's petition for review GRANTED.

The issues to be argued before this court shall be limited to whether consecutive sentences are mandated under the three strikes law (Pen.Code, § 667(b)–(i)) when a defendant on probation commits a new offense and is sentenced for both the new offense and for the original offense following revocation of probation.

GEORGE, C.J., and MOSK, KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network