Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MARCHAND et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the County of Sacramento, Respondent; SUTTER COMMUNITY HOSPITAL et al., Real Parties in Interest.
Pursuant to settlement agreement, the above-entitled cause is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, with directions to vacate its opinion and to dismiss as moot.
EAGLESON, A.C.J., and MOSK, BROUSSARD, PANELLI, KAUFMAN and KENNARD, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. S005987.
Decided: July 13, 1989
Court: Supreme Court of California,In Bank.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)