MIRANDA v. SHELL OIL COMPANY (1992)

Supreme Court of California,In Bank.

Amara Hess MIRANDA et al., Appellants, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY et al., Appellants.

S026914.

Decided: July 23, 1992

Petition for review GRANTED.

In addition to the issues raised in the petition for review the parties are directed to address the following question:

Is an order denying a motion for summary adjudication of issues an appealable order? (See Code Civ.Proc., sections 437c, subd. (l); 904.1; Ney v. 20th Century Ins. Co. (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 1041, 1043–1044, fn. 1, 275 Cal.Rptr. 319; Barth–Wittmore Ins. v. H.R. Murphy Enterprises, Inc. (1985) 169 Cal.App.3d 124, 136, 214 Cal.Rptr. 894. See also Olson v. Cory (1983) 35 Cal.3d 390, 398, 197 Cal.Rptr. 843, 673 P.2d 720.)

ARABIAN, Acting, C.J., and MOSK, KENNARD, BAXTER and GEORGE, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network