Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE, Respondent, v. David Kenneth KURTZMAN.
Appellant's petition for review GRANTED.
Pursuant to rule 29.2(b), California Rules of Court, counsel are directed to limit briefing and argument to the issue of whether a jury must acquit defendant of a greater offense before considering lesser included offenses. (See Stone v. Superior Court (1982) 31 Cal.3d 503, 183 Cal.Rptr. 647, 646 P.2d 809; CALJIC Nos. 8.75, 17.10.)
LUCAS, C.J., and MOSK, BROUSSARD, PANELLI, ARGUELLES and KAUFMAN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 18, 1988
Court: Supreme Court of California,In Bank.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)