Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of the County of Alameda, Respondent; MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Real Party in Interest.
Petition for review GRANTED. The matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Three, with directions to issue an alternative writ to be heard before that court when the proceeding is ordered on calendar.
Pending final determination of this matter, the stay issued October 26, 1987, shall remain in effect.
LUCAS, C.J., and BROUSSARD, EAGLESON and PANELLI, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. AO40157, SOO2871.
Decided: November 12, 1987
Court: Supreme Court of California,In Bank.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)