Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; Christopher A. SPELIO, Real Party in Interest.
Real party in interest Spelio was convicted in 1969 of possession of marijuana (former Health & Saf.Code, s 11530), and the conviction was affirmed on appeal (People v. Spelio (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 685, 86 Cal.Rptr. 113). On February 25, 1976, Spelio petitioned respondent superior court for an order to destroy the records of his conviction pursuant to former Health and Safety Code section 11361.5, subdivision (b) (Stats.1975, ch. 248, s 4, p. 643). On March 8, 1976, the court granted the relief prayed for. Petitioner Court of Appeal was included among the courts and agencies ordered to destroy their records of Spelio's conviction. Petitioner unsuccessfully moved to quash the order, then filed both an appeal and an application for writ of mandate in this court. We issued an alternative writ.
Petitioner's appeal was still pending when the statutory authority for the court order to destroy records was repealed without a saving clause, effective January 1, 1977. (Stats.1976, ch. 952, s 1.) For the reasons stated in Part I of our opinion in Younger v. Superior Court, Cal., 145 Cal.Rptr. 674, 577P.2d 1014, respondent superior court no longer has jurisdiction to enforce its order of March 8, 1976, and the order must therefore be vacated.1
Let a peremptory writ of mandate issue requiring respondent superior court to vacate its order for destruction of records.
FOOTNOTES
1. For the reasons stated in Part V of our opinion in Younger v. Superior Court, Cal., 145 Cal.Rptr. 674, 577 P.2d 1014, we do not reach the contention of the State Bar as amicus curiae that Health and Safety Code sections 11361.5 and 11361.7 violate the separation of powers as applied to the admission or discipline of attorneys. No party to this case is an attorney.
MOSK, Justice.
BIRD, C. J., and TOBRINER, CLARK, RICHARDSON, MANUEL and SULLIVAN (Retired Associate Justice of the Supreme Court sitting under assignment by the Chairperson of the Judicial Council), JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: L.A. 30648.
Decided: April 26, 1978
Court: Supreme Court of California, In Bank.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)