Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Lawrence L. PICKENS and Elfrieda Pickens, husband and wife, Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent.
This is a mandamus proceeding in which the judgments in consolidated actions reviewed on appeal in Pickens v. Johnson, Cal.Sup., 267 P.2d 801, are attacked on one of the grounds urged on that appeal. Inasmuch as the appeal disposes of that issue, the petition for the writ is denied and the alternative writ discharged. See California Toll Bridge Authority v. Durkee, 40 Cal.2d 341, 253 P.2d 673.
PER CURIAM.
DOOLING, J. pro tem., sat in the place of the CHIEF JUSTICE, who deemed himself disqualified.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Sac. 6350.
Decided: March 01, 1954
Court: Supreme Court of California, In Bank.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)