Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
LUBERCO, Limited, a Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Mae Ann MILLS et al., Defendants and Respondents.
It has been stipulated by the parties that the record upon this appeal presents the same question of law as that brought to the court in Harless v. Carter, Cal.Sup., 267 P.2d 4. For the reasons which have been stated in the decision of the Harless case, the judgment is affirmed.
EDMONDS, Justice.
GIBSON, C. J., and CARTER, TRAYNOR, SCHAUER and SPENCE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: L. A. 22470.
Decided: March 01, 1954
Court: Supreme Court of California, In Bank.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)