Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

REED v. NORMAN (1953)

Supreme Court of California, in Bank.

Hoyt REED, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Carl O. NORMAN and John E. Haskins, Directors and Officers of the Norman Decorating Co., Inc., a California corporation, Defendants and Respondents.

L. A. 21698.

Decided: May 12, 1953

Hy Schwartz, Beverly Hills, for appellant. John Earl Haskins, in pro. per. Howard W. Hunter, Los Angeles, for respondents.

This appeal presents the same issues as those decided in Reed v. Norman, Cal.Sup., 256 P.2d 930 filed this day, and that decision is controlling herein.

The judgment is reversed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Response sent, thank you

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law

REED v. NORMAN (1953)

Docket No: L. A. 21698.

Decided: May 12, 1953

Court: Supreme Court of California, in Bank.

Need to find an attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

    More Options

    For Legal Professionals

    Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

    Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

    Sign up

    Learn About the Law

    Get help with your legal needs

    FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

    Go to Learn About the Law

    Need to find an attorney?

    Search our directory by legal issue

    Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

      More Options
      Copied to clipboard