REED v. NORMAN (1953)

Supreme Court of California, in Bank.

Hoyt REED, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Carl O. NORMAN and John E. Haskins, Directors and Officers of the Norman Decorating Co., Inc., a California corporation, Defendants and Respondents.

L. A. 21698.

Decided: May 12, 1953

Hy Schwartz, Beverly Hills, for appellant. John Earl Haskins, in pro. per. Howard W. Hunter, Los Angeles, for respondents.

This appeal presents the same issues as those decided in Reed v. Norman, Cal.Sup., 256 P.2d 930 filed this day, and that decision is controlling herein.

The judgment is reversed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network