GRIFFITHS v. DONOGHUE (1942)

Supreme Court of California.

GRIFFITHS et al. v. DONOGHUE, Registrar of Voters, et al.

S.F. 16771.

Decided: August 27, 1942

Emery F. Mitchell, of Crescent City, for petitioners. John J. O'Toole, City Atty., and Walter A. Dold, Chief Deputy City Atty., both of San Francisco, for respondents. Hanna & Morton, of Los Angeles, Amici Curiae, for respondents.

In this proceeding in mandamus the questions of law are the same as those involved in Youngman v. Peek (S.F. 16792) ¹ in which a writ of mandate was denied on July 29, 1942. By the order in that proceeding the questions herein have become moot. This proceeding is therefore dismissed.

FOOTNOTES

1. No opinion filed.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law