CHIEROTTI v. SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT (1942)

Supreme Court of California.

John CHIEROTTI, Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al., Respondents.

S. F. 16646.

Decided: April 02, 1942

Leo R. Friedman, of San Francisco, for appellant. Earl Warren, Atty. Gen., J. Albert Hutchinson, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Matthew Brady, Dist. Atty., and Joseph A. Garry, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of San Francisco, for respondents.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion in People v. Gonzales and Chierotti, Cal.Sup.Crim. 4382, 124 P.2d 44, this day decided, the order denying the preliminary injunction is affirmed.

I dissent.

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion this day filed in the case of People v. Gonzales and Chierotti, Criminal No. 4382, supra, I am of the opinion that the order denying the preliminary injunction should be reversed.

TRAYNOR, Justice.

GIBSON, C. J., and SHENK, CURTIS, and EDMONDS, JJ., concurred.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law