IN RE: RICHARDSON. (1942)

Supreme Court of California.

IN RE: RICHARDSON.

Cr. 4277.

Decided: March 19, 1942

Miguel Estudillo, of Riverside, and Robert W. Kenny and Morris E. Cohn, both of Los Angeles, for petitioner. Philbrick McCoy, of Los Angeles, for respondent.

It appearing upon investigation and report by the State Bar that the facts and circumstances surrounding the conviction of Jerome Lyman Richardson, on his plea of guilty in action No. 27812 in the District Court of the United States in and for the Northern District of New York, do not disclose moral turpitude to have been involved in the commission of the offense, the order to show cause heretofore issued herein is discharged.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law