HAUPT v. CHARLIE KOSHER MARKET (1941)

Supreme Court of California.

HAUPT v. CHARLIE'S KOSHER MARKET et al.

L. A. 16948, 16949.

Decided: April 25, 1941

Charles W. Cradick, of Los Angeles (William H. Haupt, of Los Angeles, of counsel), for appellant. De Forrest Home, E. O. Leake, and J. J. Leake, all of Los Angeles, for respondents. J. H. O'Connor, Co. Counsel, of Los Angeles, for defendant E. W. Biscailuz, Sheriff of Los Angeles County.

The appeals in these two consolidated cases are related to the case of Haupt v. Charlie's Kosher Market et al., L.A.No. 16957, Cal.Sup., 112 P.2d 627, this day decided. In the decision in that case the judgment appealed from was affirmed in favor of plaintiff therein.

These two appeals taken by plaintiff in said case L. A. No. 16957 are from separate but similar orders made by the trial court therein after rendition of judgment, by which the trial court recalled execution of the judgment, directed a deposit in court of the amount of the lien claimed by plaintiff, and ordered a stay of execution pending the appeal from the judgment.

Our affirmance of the judgment in L. A. No. 16957 obviates any question as to plaintiff's right to take appropriate steps to realize on the judgment, and necessarily renders the present appeals moot.

The appeals from the orders are, and each is, dismissed.

GIBSON, Chief Justice.

We concur: SHENK, J.; CURTIS, J.; EDMONDS, J.; CARTER, J.; TRAYNOR, J.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law