CAMINETTI v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE (1941)

Supreme Court of California.

A. CAMINETTI, Jr., Insurance Commissioner, Applicant, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, Respondent.

L. A. 17727.

Decided: January 06, 1941

Earl Warren, Atty. Gen., Walter L. Bowers, John L. Nourse, and Neil Cunningham, Deputy Attys. Gen., and William T. Sweigert, Asst. Atty. Gen., for applicant. Forgy, Reinhaus & Forgy, of Santa Ana, and Sherman & Sherman, Robert W. Kenny, and Morris E. Cohn, all of Los Angeles, for respondent.

The facts and issues presented in this proceeding together with such additional observations as appear in Caminetti v. Superior Court, CalSup., 108 P.2d 918, this day filed, are substantially similar to those presented in Caminetti v. Superior Court, Cal.Sup., 108 P.2d 911, this day decided. For the reasons advanced in and upon the authority of the last-cited case, let peremptory writs of prohibition and mandate issue respectively restraining the respondent superior court from taking any further steps or proceedings in the conservatorship proceeding pending therein, and directing it to transfer the same to the superior court in and for the county of Los Angeles.

PER CURIAM.

GIBSON, C. J., does not participate in the decision.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law