LAUGHLIN v. STATE (1940)

Defendant herein appeals from a judgment of the superior court of Alameda county in favor of plaintiff, awarding $7,500 for the damages allegedly sustained by plaintiff as the result of the construction of a subway in the street fronting her property. This is one of a series of similar cases in which the facts, rights and liabilities, are substantially the same. All material legal questions here presented are disposed of in a decision this day filed in the case of Rose et al. v. State of California et al., Cal.Supp., 105 P.2d 302. Upon the authorities there cited and for the reasons there given, the judgment herein is affirmed.

CARTER, Justice.

We concur: GIBSON, C. J.; SHENK, J.; CURTIS, J.; EDMONDS, J.