Ella T. LAUGHLIN (a Widow), Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STATE of California, Defendant and Appellant.
S. F. 16039.
Decided: June 27, 1940
C. C. Carleton, Frank B. Durkee, C. R. Montgomery, and Robert E. Reed, all of Sacramento, for appellant. Louis J. Trabucco and Eugene K. Sturgis, both of Oakland, for respondent.
Defendant herein appeals from a judgment of the superior court of Alameda county in favor of plaintiff, awarding $7,500 for the damages allegedly sustained by plaintiff as the result of the construction of a subway in the street fronting her property. This is one of a series of similar cases in which the facts, rights and liabilities, are substantially the same. All material legal questions here presented are disposed of in a decision this day filed in the case of Rose et al. v. State of California et al., Cal.Supp., 105 P.2d 302. Upon the authorities there cited and for the reasons there given, the judgment herein is affirmed.
We concur: GIBSON, C. J.; SHENK, J.; CURTIS, J.; EDMONDS, J.
Was this helpful?
Response sent, thank you
Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.