SPEIK v. SUTPHIN (1940)

Supreme Court of California.

SPEIK v. SUTPHIN.

L. A. 16530.

Decided: February 29, 1940

John W. Preston and Crump & Rogers, all of Los Angeles, for appellant. Leland J. Allen, of Los Angeles, for respondent.

This is an action to quiet title and to obtain declaratory relief in respect to rights arising under an oil lease. The action raises the same issues as those presented in the companion case of Sutphin v. Speik, 99 P.2d 652, this day decided. On the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.

GIBSON, Justice.

We concur: WASTE, C. J.; EDMONDS, J.; CARTER, J.; CURTIS, J.; WOOD, Justice pro tem.; Mc,COMB, Justice pro tem.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network