Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
David E. HINCKLE and Alice Clark Ryan, Plaintiffs, v. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants.
The petition for a writ of mandate is denied without prejudice to the consideration of the contentions of the petitioners, plaintiffs herein, on the appeal from any judgment which may be rendered in the action pending in the superior court of the state of California, in and for the county of Los Angeles, entitled: ‘David E. Hinckle, plaintiff, v. Board of Education of City of Los Angeles et al., defendants', and numbered 430815.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: S. F. 16114.
Decided: August 25, 1938
Court: Supreme Court of California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)