SACHSE v. CRAEMER (1938)

Supreme Court of California.

Richard SACHSE, for Himself and on Behalf of All Other Claimants Similarly Situated, Petitioner, v. Justus F. CRAEMER, as Building and Loan Commissioner of the State of California, Respondent.

L. A. 16582.

Decided: June 10, 1938

John C. Campbell and Franz R. Sachse, both of Los Angeles, for petitioner. Clock, McWhinney & Clock and James C. Ingebretsen, all of Los Angeles, for respondent.

This is a companion case to the case of Ventura Company, Inc., v. Craemer, 80 P.2d 720, this day decided. On the authority of that decision, and for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed therein, the petitioner herein is entitled to the writ of mandamus.

Let the peremptory writ issue. 27 Cal.App.2d 129

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law