SECURITY FIRST NAT BANK OF LOS ANGELES v. SAPKIN (1937)

Supreme Court of California.

SECURITY-FIRST NAT. BANK OF LOS ANGELES et al. v. SAPKIN et al.

Civ. 11177.

Decided: April 12, 1937

Lawrence M. Cahill and L. A. Bloom, both of Los Angeles, for appellants. Gene G. Curry, Thomas M. Parrington, both of Los Angeles, for respondents.

In denying the petition for hearing in this court after decision by the District Court of Appeal of the Second Appellate District, Division 1, we withhold our approval of that language which is apparently an inadvertence, to the effect that the statute of limitations on an action to recover a deficiency after sale under a deed of trust was four years from the date of the sale. Under section 337 of the Code iof Civil Procedure prior to the amendment of 1933 (St.1933, p. 2116), the statute of limitations was four years from the date of maturity.

The petition for a hearing is denied.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law