Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ex parte McDONOUGH.
Upon full consideration of the questions presented by the petitioner herein the court finds itself in full agreement with the decision and conclusion announced by the District Court of Appeal of the First Appellate District, Division 1, in the Matter of the Application of Peter P. McDonough, for a writ of habeas corpus, filed and entered in said court on June 7, 1937, 68 P.(2d) 1020. The grounds for the issuance of the writ are substantially the same in each case, and the cases and reasoning upon which the petition was denied by said District Court of Appeal applies with equal force to the petitioner in the instant case. No sufficient reason appearing which would justify the issuance of the writ, the petition is therefore denied.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Cr. 4120.
Decided: June 10, 1937
Court: Supreme Court of California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)