Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

ZADRO v. << (1936)

Supreme Court of California.

Ex parte ZADRO.

Cr. 1530.

Decided: September 28, 1936

King & King, of Napa, for petitioner. U. S. Webb, Atty. Gen., Ralph H. Cowing, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Mervin C. Lernhart and Sheldon Rutherford, both of Napa, for respondent.

In denying a petition for hearing in this case, after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, we withhold approval of the statement in the opinion that the first thirteen counts are not triable in the superior court. If, in fact, the justice's court where the offense was committed is a class B justice's court, then, under the authority of People v. Tom Nop, 124 Cal. 150, 56 P. 786, jurisdiction would be in the superior court.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Thank you for your feedback!

FindLaw Marketing Authority Suite

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network

ZADRO v. << (1936)

Docket No: Cr. 1530.

Decided: September 28, 1936

Court: Supreme Court of California.

Need to Find an Attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

For Legal Professionals

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign Up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Go to Learn About The Law

Need to Find an Attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

Copied to clipboard