HILD v. JUSTICE COURT OF STOCKTON TP SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY (1936)

In denying petition for hearing in this case, after decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, attention should be called to the fact that the opinion apparently contains a clerical error in its reference to rule V. The court evidently intended to refer to section 1 of rule V. Rule V consists of three sections, and, while none of the sections is applicable to the present case, yet the rule refers to several matters other than motions to dismiss for failure to file transcript or briefs on appeal.

PER CURIAM.