Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Application of WONG WAY for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
In this case, as in the case of In re Byron Mark (Cal.Sup.) 58 P.(2d) 913, this day decided, a writ of habeas corpus was issued for the purpose of considering the validity of the arrest and conviction of the petitioner for a violation of section 5–8.22 of the same ordinance of the city of Oakland which was involved in the Mark Case. Inasmuch as each case depended upon identical questions of fact and law, the disposition of the matter in the Mark Case is controlling here.
It is therefore ordered that the petitioner be discharged from custody.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Cr. 3974.
Decided: June 18, 1936
Court: Supreme Court of California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)