Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

IN RE: LAVINE. (1935)

Supreme Court of California.

IN RE: LAVINE.

S. F. 15188.

Decided: February 28, 1935

Morris Lavine, of Los Angeles, in pro. per. Norman S. Sterry, Louis W. Myers, and Philbrick McCoy, all of Los Angeles, for respondent State Bar.

The petition for a rehearing herein is denied.

The opinion is modified by striking therefrom the fourth sentence in the first paragraph appearing in volume 41 P.(2d) at page 161, reading as follows: ‘No claim is here made that the pardon was the result of a subsequent showing of petitioner's innocence of the crime.’

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Thank you for your feedback!

FindLaw Marketing Authority Suite

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network

IN RE: LAVINE. (1935)

Docket No: S. F. 15188.

Decided: February 28, 1935

Court: Supreme Court of California.

Need to Find an Attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

For Legal Professionals

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign Up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Go to Learn About The Law

Need to Find an Attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

Copied to clipboard