Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SVENSKA EVANGELISKA MISSIONSFORSAMLINGEN, AT TURLOCK, v. WEAVER et al.
On the submission of the cause after argument, the Chief Justice announced that the motion to dismiss or affirm was granted, and that the judgment was affirmed upon all the grounds stated in the motion.
The court is convinced that the appeal is frivolous. The deed to the property in question contained no condition subsequent, and expressly contemplated possible sale of the premises. The breach, if any, was in 1903 or before, and the statute of limitations has long since barred any possible claim of defendants. The deed by the surviving grantor, though erroneous in designation of the grantee, was perfectly valid when reformed. Plaintiff has adversely possessed the premises, under color of title, for many years, and has full title by adverse possession, if nothing else.
The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Sac. 4971.
Decided: November 12, 1935
Court: Supreme Court of California.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)