CITY OF PASADENA v. CHAMBERLAIN (1934)

Supreme Court of California

CITY OF PASADENA v. CHAMBERLAIN.

Civ. 9867.

Decided: October 04, 1934

Harold P. Huls, City Atty., and John W. Holmes, Dep. City Atty., both of Pasadena, for petitioner. Cruickshank, Brooke & Evans, of Pasadena, for respondent. Orrick, Palmer & Dahlquist, of San Francisco, amici curiae.

Petitioner's application to have the above-entitled cause heard and determined by this court after judgment in the District Court of Appeal of the Second Appellate District, Division 2, is denied. Judgment in this case was entered in the District Court of Appeal on September 27, 1934. The Constitution, article 6, § 4c, grants power to the Supreme Court to order any cause pending before a District Court of Appeal to be heard and determined by the Supreme Court. Such order may be made before judgment has been pronounced by the District Court of Appeal or, in civil cases, within thirty days after judgment in the appellate tribunal shall have become final.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law