Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

KARLE v. REED (1934)

Supreme Court of California.

Katie KARLE, Respondent, v. James A. REED et al., Appellants.

Civ. 1115.

Decided: November 26, 1934

Harry P. Sweet, of San Diego, and Joe Crider, Jr., of Los Angeles, for appellants. Glen H. Munkelt, of San Diego, for respondent.

The petition for a hearing is denied. In denying a hearing, however, we think that the judgment should be affirmed under the provisions of article 6, § 4 1/2, of the Constitution, and we withhold approval of that portion of the opinion of the District Court of Appeal which deals with the admissibility of the contract provision and the propriety of the instruction of the trial court thereon.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Thank you for your feedback!

FindLaw Marketing Authority Suite

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network

KARLE v. REED (1934)

Docket No: Civ. 1115.

Decided: November 26, 1934

Court: Supreme Court of California.

Need to Find an Attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

For Legal Professionals

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign Up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Go to Learn About The Law

Need to Find an Attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

Copied to clipboard