GRAY v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA (1934)

Supreme Court of California.

GRAY v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA.

S. F. 15063.

Decided: July 02, 1934

Joseph Scott and Jerry Giesler, both of Los Angeles, for petitioner. Phibrick McCoy, of Los Angeles, for respondent State Bar.

It appearing that the transaction which formed the basis of the charges preferred against petitioner, and which resulted in a recommendation by the board of governors of the State Bar that he be suspended from practice of the law for a period of one year, involved a party or parties who participated therein with petitioner, but who were not proceeded against, and whose conduct in the matter has not been inquired into, it is hereby ordered that this entire proceeding be remanded to the board of governors, with directions to reopen the same, and by proper orders to bring before it for investigation any members of the State Bar who directly participated in the said transaction, or take such further steps as may seem meet and proper.

PER CURIAM.

We dissent: WASTE, C. J.; SHENK, J.; IRA F. THOMPSON, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law