HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO v. Estelle Latta et al., Defendants and Appellants. (1959)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1, California.

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a public body, corporate and politic, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALL PERSONS CLAIMING ANY INTEREST IN, OR LIEN UPON, REAL PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED, OR ANY PART THEREOF, Defendants, Estelle Latta et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Civ. 18608.

Decided: August 10, 1959

Busick & Busick, Sacramento, for appellants. Gerald J. O'Gara, San Francisco, for respondent.

Defendant Estelle Latta, purporting to act for herself and others, appeals from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of plaintiff.

Except as to the name of the plaintiff, the complaint and answer are identical with those in Universal Land Co. v. All Persons, No. 18579, Cal.App., 342 P.2d 958. Plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings on the grounds that said answer did not set up a ground of defense and showed laches.

As the questions presented are identical with those in case No. 18579, it is unnecessary to discuss them here. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.

BRAY, Presiding Justice.

FRED B. WOOD and TOBRINER, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network