ROUSSEAU v. TOBIN (1957)

District Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2, California.

Ann ROUSSEAU, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Cyril R. TOBIN, Individually, and the Law Firm of Tobin & Tobin, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Civ. 16987.

Decided: February 26, 1957

Ann Rousseau, in pro. per. Tobin & Tobin, John J. Hopkins, San Francisco, for respondents.

This case is similar to Rousseau v. O'Gara, Cal.App., 307 P.2d 376. Respondents are attorneys who represented parties adverse to appellant in the prior action, Rousseau v. Hurtado, 122 Cal.App.2d 705, 265 P.2d 580. The amended complaint contains allegations similar to those found in the O'Gara case. Respondents' demurrer to appellant's amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. For the reasons given in our opinion in that case the judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

DOOLING, Acting Presiding Justice.

KAUFMAN, J., and DRAPER, J. pro tem., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network